Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] Architectural renovation

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:

    Bruce> So if you wanted to play with something and build a proof
    Bruce> of concept cool thing for people to play with, then that
    Bruce> would be a good place to start, I think---three choices of
    Bruce> scheme using an already widely used fairly robust canvas
    Bruce> widget.

And of course there's always XEmacs Lisp.  Configure --with-gnome.

    Bruce> It's probably good enough for a demo; I'm not sure whether
    Bruce> it would be better or worse than what's in XEmacs.

*chortle*

On second thought, I take that *chortle* back.  --with-gtk and
--with-gnome were implemented in the old days, we don't support GTK+ 2
yet.  So maybe you don't get the canvas widget for free.

On third thought, I take that *chortle* and redirect it at Tom.  See
what one can get, completely by accident and one didn't even know one
had it, with excessively general abstraction?  "That's no accident;
that's genius."  ;-)

-- 
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.