Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?

[Karel Gardas]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Stig Brautaset wrote:

> On Sep 17 2003, Samium wrote:
> > > So it looks like you're right.  Someone wrote bk2svn too, I wonder what
> > > their relation to svn itself was..
> >
> >  Hmm, so what about using bk2svn as the start, instead of bk?
>
> A few questions:
>
> Would that require svn to be setup?
> Why not use base it on cscvs instead?

Other question: is bk2cvs normal product sell by BitMover or just and only
"service" provided to Linux kernel developers/users community? In the
later case possible bk2arch might be used only for updating Linux Arch
archive.

Cheers,

Karel
--
Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com