Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?

[Paul Hedderly]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 03:46:41PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 03:29:14PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
> > > > This is the relevant clause:
> > > >
> > > > (d)  Notwithstanding any other terms in this License, this
> > > >      License is not available to You if  You  and/or  your
> > > >      employer  develop,  produce,  sell,  and/or  resell a
> > > >      product which contains substantially similar capabil-
> > > >      ities  of  the BitKeeper Software, or, in the reason-
> > > >      able opinion of BitMover, competes with the BitKeeper
> > > >      Software.
> > >
> > > I'm afraid that by "develop" there is also mean developing any addition to
> > > tla. So IMHO any development of direct (vide below) bk2arch is prohibited.
> >
> > Hrm, yeah, and bk2arch would almost certainly be classed as 'competing
> > product'.
> 
> Very competing - I would even say that one of the biggest competitor are
> "migration tools" to competitor technology :-)

Sod. That's a good point :O)

--
Paul