[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SCM vs CM
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SCM vs CM |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: "Mark A. Flacy" <address@hidden>
["what is `configuration management'"]
> >From what I've seen, it normally means that you can track requirements
and
> fixes through the code to your final product. No doubt it helps with ISO
> documentation requirements. (Because creating software is just like
> manufacturing. [Rolls eyes])
I think that that's not _quite_ right. The parts of those features
that let you "audit" your builds to see what changes are in there (in
terms of revision control coordinates) is CM --- the stuff that let's
you map requirements onto revision control coordinates are more like
"process management". Not that the distinction matters much.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SCM vs CM, Tom Lord, 2003/09/25