|
From: | Tupshin Harper |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch |
Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:20:50 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20030924 |
Miles Bader wrote:
Obviously something extremely hard to quantify in the open source world. FWIW, I've used it on production servers for 2-3 years.On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:12:34PM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote:Not exactly. Many people already use ReiserFS. And yes it does _very_ cpu-wise efficient handling of large amount of files and also tail packing.Care to quantify "Many people"? As far as I know, it's a small minority, and will be for a long time. Most people are _very_ conservative about choosing what filesystem they use, and reiserfs doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation for stability. -Miles
One of the few metrics for this kind of thing that is even remotely useful is the debian package popularity contest.
http://people.debian.org/~apenwarr/popcon/In the latest stats, out of 1504 computers that submitted data these are the fs utils results(number claims to be those that use the package regularly).
xfsprogs: 70 jfsutils: 26 reiserfsprogs: 141 e2fsprogs: 1071unfortunately, the ext2 utils manipulate ext3 filesystems, so this info is impossible to deduce.
Rough answer says that a bit more than 10% of debian users reporting statistics are reiserfs users.
-Tupshin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |