[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit"
From: |
Jan Hudec |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit" |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:33:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 17:03:38 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Jan Hudec <address@hidden> writes:
> > > 3.b More generally, we need to nail down the mechanism that computes
> > > "selected" views of the ORIG and MOD trees, and what counts as an
> > > error.
> >
> > I think following should work and not get too hard to do: First check
> > for renames across the limit boundary (and probably consider them user
> > error)
>
> As a practical matter, I don't want renames across boundaries to be an
> error, I'd like the presence of either half of a rename inside a limit
> to automatically include the other half.
Yes. It's probably better. And it's easy -- you just add such a file to
the appropriate list.
> It's very natural to do:
>
> mv OLD NEW
> tla commit -- NEW
>
> That is, I tend to think of a renamed file as a single entity; if I had
> to do `tla commit -- OLD NEW' to make that work, it would seem very odd.
>
> -Miles
> --
> [|nurgle|] ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that
> will make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth?
> [iddt] nurg, that's the goal
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>