[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit"
From: |
Jan Hudec |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit" |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:35:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 06:35:51 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
> > I wonder if rather than "restricting attention" you might consider
> > actually generating a second tree from the first, with the changes that
> > are not to be committed split out into the second tree that is a
> > complement of the first. This would accomodate not only dir and file
> > limits, but also hunk limits as well.
>
> That sounds _way_ more inefficient for large trees (whereas `restricting
> attition' could _help_ large trees). Please think of the large trees.
No, it can't! You have to make full inventory anyway, because renames
could cause bad things otherwise.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing and extending "selected commit", Jan Hudec, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/01
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Collins, 2003/10/02