|
From: | Samium Gromoff |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager |
Date: | Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:27:02 +0400 |
User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.11.7 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:40:34 -0700 (PDT), Davide Libenzi wrote: > The fs structure I believe is fine indeed. But you have to agree that > vm-fix-hipte-locking is better than patch-417. I think there was a sort of > agreement on named patches though. Every revision have a "summary" field. tla revisions -s regards, Samium Gromoff
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |