[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:26:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:11:23AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> > times (this is what my suggestion of a `hidden' flag was intended to
> > simulate, in simple, albeit rather ad-hoc, manner).
>
> From what are these names "hidden"? `tla branches'? `tla abrowse'?
> `tla log-versions'? `tla library-branches'?
I think just archive listing operations: `tla abrowse' and `tla branches'
(presumably with a --hidden option to show everything).
In the case of revlibs because you can simply delete any offending branches;
in the case of patch-logs, I think it's less common to look at patch-log
versions, and more interesting to see historical entries (though probably
these would be pruned in the same way you'd prune any excessive patch-log
accumulation after a long time).
-Miles
--
o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by
Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] named patches and "Does Linus matter?", Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches and "Does Linus matter?", Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches and "Does Linus matter?", Tom Lord, 2003/10/02