[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:22:38 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
> If Tom would enlighten me on how to do away without pristine trees, I'd
do
> my best to farewell them. It sounds better than losing time in
hardlinking
> them, if possible.
Have a look at `src/tla/libarch/local-cache.[hc]'.
The vague problem statement is to implement the functions declared in
the .h in such a way that they "work well".
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Robert Anderson, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Tom Lord, 2003/10/05