[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:21:21 +0200 (CEST) |
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
>
> > If Tom would enlighten me on how to do away without pristine trees, I'd
> do
> > my best to farewell them. It sounds better than losing time in
> hardlinking
> > them, if possible.
>
> Have a look at `src/tla/libarch/local-cache.[hc]'.
>
> The vague problem statement is to implement the functions declared in
> the .h in such a way that they "work well".
At a first glimpse and applying logic, if we want to get rid of pristine
trees, we have to make the revision library mandatory.
Is that an issue? I don't think so, we could even have a default path for
it if not supplied, so that the user shouldn't have to type it the first
time.
Pau
- [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hardlinked pristine trees, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Robert Anderson, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Tom Lord, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] losing pristine trees? Slowdown for network archives..., Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/05