[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:31:53 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Charles Duffy <address@hidden>
> One effective difference between C and Java: While there may be some
> necessity of having an effective handler for any given error, Java's
> syntax allows clumping rather than checking individually.
It's worth mentioning that the syntax optimization question (which is
what you're talking about, really) is a separate question from the
"exceptions or error-codes" question. There's no reason you couldn't
make up a language that has a try-like syntax but uses error codes.
Java, if modified to enforce the stronger call-site checking I've
described, would be such a language.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robin Farine, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Ben Burns, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Momchil Velikov, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21