[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:37:23 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Thomas Zander <address@hidden>
> I understand your reasoning but I reject it due to the fact that
> my classes will not compile when the change you think will break
> things has occurred,
The checking done by the compiler is approximate. It will catch
_some_ changes to throw lists, but not necessarily all. That is, as
nearly as I can tell, why the spec says the feature is intended to
_reduce_ (not eliminate) the number of checked exceptions handled
improperly.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, zander, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Ben Burns, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Momchil Velikov, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Miles Bader, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Nit, Miles Bader, 2003/10/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21