[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch_inventory_traversal
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch_inventory_traversal |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:59:38 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: address@hidden (RedHog (=?iso-8859-1?q?Egil_M=F6ller?=))
>
> > I have recently been queried about how good Arch (tla) was on
> > handling large inventories. As a test, I imported the Linux
> > kernel tree (about 100Mb), and it turned out a one-file-change
> > took about 20min to commit. This is not acceptable, so I started
> > profiling.
>
> We've certainly seen some reports about rather better performance
> on that very tree but, ok..... let's look into this.
Having spare revision libaries + not using pristines + hardlinking the
tree would make it much faster. In these huge trees it's almost a must:
you save space, time and headaches ;)
Pau