[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge an
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:13:39 -0500 |
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:26, Tom Lord wrote:
> Not necessarily. Not if `commit --continuation' reappears, for one
> solution. Other solutions that don't need a project tree (which
> commit would, but that might not be a bad thing for a clone command)
> also exist.
Could you elaborate a bit more? What solution do you think is best?
> You wished for a solution that didn't involve tracing ancestry. I
> suggested some ways to do that but, if you didn't like those, I was
> suggesting that perhaps the wish was a fantasy (like "and, I'd like a
> pony").
It just seems unfortunate if that were the only way, given that I think
the most common case is going to be with the continuation being base-0,
so we'll traverse the entire history.
> When there are tags more recent than base-0.
Why would you do this? Wouldn't you lose all the changes from previous
revisions?
> This is an example of
> one of those "edge cases" you sometimes hear Larry McVoy talking
> about.
Maybe. It seems like a pretty easy to understand case.
> So far, in arch, we've got those under pretty good control [...]
We're going offtopic here, but - I'm not so sure about that. What I
think of as edge cases in arch are more like what happens when you
change tagging methods in the middle of a project, or you change the
inventory for some subdirectory in one patch and merge with a patch that
has an inventory change that subtly conflicts with that. Or something.
Certainly those are the kinds of issues I've seen.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Colin Walters, 2003/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Tom Lord, 2003/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Colin Walters, 2003/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Tom Lord, 2003/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Colin Walters, 2003/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Tom Lord, 2003/11/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Robert Collins, 2003/11/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Colin Walters, 2003/11/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Robert Collins, 2003/11/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Tom Lord, 2003/11/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Colin Walters, 2003/11/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Monolithic vs layered programs, Robert Collins, 2003/11/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Charles Duffy, 2003/11/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Robert Collins, 2003/11/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Colin Walters, 2003/11/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes in address@hidden, and star-merge and update/replay defaults, Robert Collins, 2003/11/09