[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery??? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:39:44 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> writes:
Andrew> No. The former is a set of things which people as a group
Andrew> cannot realistically be prevented from doing ("inalienable
Andrew> rights" if you are feeling trite, although "rights" don't
Andrew> actually exist); the latter is not (the US prohibits many
Andrew> of its citizens from one or more of these, for example).
Artistic obfuscation. Why bother? I would think a Debian developer,
of all people, would prefer to make a constructive contribution.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Parker, Ron, 2003/11/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Tom Lord, 2003/11/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Paul Hedderly, 2003/11/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Tom Lord, 2003/11/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, zander, 2003/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Tom Lord, 2003/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Slavery???, Tom Lord, 2003/11/12