[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:39:08 -0800 (PST) |
> From: David Brown <address@hidden>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > The reason that the kb->cvs gateway is present is due to CVS being the
> > 'standard', not because so many want to use something not-bk.
> I've sure seen complaints about people not being able to use BK and
> asking for something. CVS was probably chosen because it is 'standard'
> and exists, but the demand is definitely influenced by people not
> wanting, or not able to use BK.
Amusingly, LM claims that there are about 6 users of the CVS gateway.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Jan Harkes, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Thomas Zander, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, David Brown, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Miles Bader, 2003/11/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Tupshin Harper, 2003/11/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Bruce Stephens, 2003/11/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Florian Weimer, 2003/11/13