gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?


From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:37:09 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Robin Farine wrote:
> If you do a normal 'get', it will not populate the library since 'get'
> does not need anything from it. Instead, try 'get --link'.

Ah, good point; --link isn't necessary though, if you have a greedy library,
it should add a library revision as soon as you need one, e.g., if you do
`tla changes' or something (and of course get shouldn't create a pristine dir
underneath {arch}).

-Miles
-- 
Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]