[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:22:48 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Florian Weimer <address@hidden>
> Tom Lord wrote:
> > _Won't_ happen for different reasons, but prohibition against
> > cross-directory hard links doesn't imply a need for in-tree
> > pristines. Why would it?
> It makes space management a very pressing issue because your revision
> library tends to grow quickly, without bounds (even if it's sparse).
First thing is -- when I wrote that I was just sleepily overlooking
the links _internal_ to a library and took you to be concerned about
linking to make project trees. Sorry -- coffee is brewing.
Linkless revlibs would, indeed, grow quickly but I wonder if it might
be worth it anyway, just to get pristines out from under {arch}. More
agressive pruning of the revlib would cure the space issue. (And, as
I said, I wonder if there isn't a union-mount option in some
environments.) But overall, such things are probably best left for
AFS users feeling the pain .....
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Benjamin Bytheway, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robin Farine, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Jan Hudec, 2003/12/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robert Collins, 2003/12/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Mark Thomas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 2003/12/17