[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:51:20 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Robin Farine <address@hidden>
> >>>>> Benjamin Bytheway writes:
> > I've replicated the steps, and it doesn't work for me. I end up
with
> > an empty revlib.
> If you do a normal 'get', it will not populate the library since 'get'
> does not need anything from it. Instead, try 'get --link'.
or 'get --library'.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Charles Duffy, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, James Blackwell, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/21