[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:00:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 08:49:00AM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
> Since OOo will save some 5 different XML streams inside a zip file its
> quite easy to do revision management on XML only streams once you have a
> XMLDiff application in place. (which should be first priority)
Remember: diff is easy, it's a variation on the LCS problem. patch is
harder, because you're supposed to take advantage of context (it's
pretty stupid to write a patch tool for an unordered list that
emulates patch(1) rather than re-ordering the list as needed, for
example).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Momchil Velikov, 2003/12/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?,
Andrew Suffield <=
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, michael josenhans, 2003/12/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/19