[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo)
From: |
Thomas Zander |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:47:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.94 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 22 December 2003 19:22, Tom Lord wrote:
> >> The question is whether they will produce (a) valid and then (b)
> >> sane OO documents given valid and sane OO document inputs.
> >
> > If not; then the Schema is needed to do so which will make sure
> > it is. But I doubt it will be needed.
>
> I'm really puzzled, for multiple reasons, why you think that "Schema"
> are in any way relevent here or that they solve any problem. You're
> just reinforcing my feeling that W3C productions have long since
> degenerated into non-productive buzzword slingling and are largely to
> blame for the stalling of the industry known as the burst of the .com
> bubble (and worse problems).
....
> > Besides; the proposal was to make the merge-conflicts be handled
> > by OOo in a specific 'merge' widget that converts the DOM domain
> > objects to viewable changes so the user can select the revision
> > (A, B, A and B, B and A) that should be used in the resulting
> > document.
>
> I have little idea what you might be talking about. "widget"? "DOM
> domain objects"?
>
> This is like saying: "Mr. Ford! Exciting News! I have figured out
> how we can mass-produce your model T. It's quite simple, really: we
> need only build a machine whose gears and levers transform raw
> materials into automobiles. Gears and levers are well understood
> technology so I am sure that your mechanics will have little
> difficulty assembling this machine."
Thank you Tom; this email put a smile back on my face; quite funny :-)
- --
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/53SVCojCW6H2z/QRAiB2AJ4xCSsdA88VFqk3l7nyijDXvsKdwQCfby+S
K+B9OcMtSXQwC7aUV3rsdHg=
=5FsL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, conrad, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Thomas Zander, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo),
Thomas Zander <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Charles Duffy, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Tom Lord, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: revision control for documents (was plug-in foo), Thomas Zander, 2003/12/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Aaron Bentley, 2003/12/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File-tpye plug-in architecture for Arch?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/22