[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:17:21 -0800 (PST) |
> From: address@hidden
> Done. The following change:
> --- vu-sys.c.old 2004-02-10 23:33:20.000000000 +0000
> +++ vu-sys.c 2004-02-10 23:34:01.000000000 +0000
> @@ -632,6 +632,11 @@
> void * closure)
> {
> ssize_t rv;
> +
> +/* In order to get around irritating AIX behaviour: */
> + if (count == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> rv = write (fd, buf, count);
> if (rv == -1)
> *errn = errno;
> fixes the problem and allows all tests to PASS.
Thanks.
> Just to check; is the following the expected output from
> test-mv-explicit.sh? I'm slightly concerned by the error messages, but a
> PASS is reported anyway.
Yes, that's the expected output. It's testing a case where the user
most often (we presume) would want a warning -- but a case that arch
should handle nonetheless. The message you're seeing is the warning.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, tow21, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, Tom Lord, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, tow21, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, tow21, 2004/02/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, tow21, 2004/02/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, Robert Collins, 2004/02/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, Tom Lord, 2004/02/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix, tow21, 2004/02/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on aix,
Tom Lord <=