Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.

[Fabio Ferrari]

Andrew Suffield escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:45:39AM -0700, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
> ... 
> >   Fundamentally, I think that arch should store HEAD, with reverse 
> > patches, rather then START with forward patches.
> Unnecessary. You can layer this over the top quite easily, by having a
> commit hook that cacherevs the latest revision and uncacherevs the
> prior one.

That's a nice behavior that maybe could be default in tla. That way, if 
a explicit cache request is done, the cache is not removed.

Fabio