Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.

[Robert Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
From: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead
of arch.

>
>    > From: "Pierce T. Wetter III" <address@hidden>
>
>    >    So we're still in the "CVS sucks, but does it suck
enough to be worth 
>    > switching" state.
>
>    >    Hence the "might use subversion" above. We might just
stick with CVS 
>    > until tla 1.4 :-)
>
>Don't switch, then.  Stick to CVS.  From my perspective: Subversion
>will increase your costs far more than it reduces them.

I'll repeat myself here:

I really wanted to like subversion.  But after awhile, I couldn't
help but conclude that it was a slower, incomplete, oft-broken
CVS with multiple unstable dependencies.

Bob