Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tutorial Question

[Pierce T . Wetter III]

On Feb 24, 2004, at 8:58 PM, Robert Anderson wrote:

> Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
>
> >  So it seems like using a person's name as a branch label would be bad
> > practice.
> >
> >  Probably the real reason though is that I tend to "branch" only when 
> > I need to collaborate with another developer, so they wouldn't be 
> > "my" changes.
> >
> >  Pierce
>
>
> If you're trying to find the "one true way" to organize and name 
> branches, stop right there.  It doesn't exist.  The branch per 
> developer idiom has been in common use since about day 1 of arch 
> release.  Other ways can work as well.  People will find uses for them 
> that neither you or I could possibly think of.  It's just a component 
> of a name.  Nothing more.

 No, I'm trying to find the "one true way" to name branches for the 
tutorial. I realize that different people will name branches 
differently. I got confused when the branch was named the same as the 
new archive.

 The above quote is just a comment on what I think would be best in 
general.

 Pierce