[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] mails delayed
From: |
Yann Droneaud |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] mails delayed |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:31:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Adrien Beau <address@hidden> writes:
> On Monday 08 March 2004 21:22, Yann Droneaud wrote:
>>
>> > Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
>> > by mx1.tuxfamily.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
>> > id 1B0R3s-00074D-00
>> > for address@hidden; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:09:16 +0100
>>
>> Delayed 1 hour (quite normal: USA to France).
>>
>> > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
>> > by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
>> > id 1B0R3K-0007n9-V2
>> > for address@hidden; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:08:42 -0500
>
> It is not normal to have an hour delay between the USA and France,
> or between any two places: this is the Internet, and this is the
> 21st century.
>
You don't know how TuxFamily's servers work ;)
Sure, 1 hour is too long for an IP paquet to travel across the ocean,
but i tried to mean that one hour to make a mail delivery on a busy
server is quite common but not the norm (DNS timeout, connection
timeout, inverse resolve, etc ...).
> Actually, if you do that math, this is a 34 seconds delay (assuming
> the clocks at gnu.org and tuxfamily.net are accurately set), which
> is much more normal.
>
Yes, I made a big timezone mistake :/
I hope TuxFamily clock are correctly synchronized since i'm the ntp
master here. But it seems i still have problems with timezone ;)
> Still, the sixty hours delay inside gnu.org is irritating.
>
I hope this *was* irritating.
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud <address@hidden> +33 6 88 40 82 43
<address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
http://corporate.meuh.org/ http://meuh.tuxfamily.org/
1024D/BEA43321 5D91 B5B0 5137 B8FE 6882 FE19 CAA0 6F05 BEA4 3321