[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin |
Date: |
11 Mar 2004 15:22:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> I think we could live without inode signatures for working directories.
Definitely.
> It's just an optimization there-- we can diff every file, if it comes to
> that.
I'd rather assume that if ctime and size have not changed, then the file
hasn't changed, even though it's possibly incorrect.
> But I'd hate to go without inode signatures in libraries, because
> detecting corruption is essential.
Detecting corruption is *not* essential when I want to look
at `tla file-diffs' or `tla changes'.
It's even less essential to detect corruption of file BAR when I do
`tla file-diffs FOO'.
And if we really want to detect corruption, how about MD5 instead of inodes?
Stefan
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin -> FAT partition, (continued)
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, Parker, Ron, 2004/03/09
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, Parker, Ron, 2004/03/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/10