[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin
From: |
Greek0 |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:31:15 +0100 |
On 11 Mar 2004 15:22:32 -0500
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> And if we really want to detect corruption, how about MD5 instead of
> inodes?
Inode signatures are fast, MD5 is slow. You have to read the whole file
to determinate the md5 sum, and that's exactly what you want to prevent
using inode sigs.
I think on FAT ctime & filenames should be enough to detect corruption.
I don't know how tla should detect corruption on NFS though. Actually I
don't think there's a right way to it. Either you don't do it at all,
which is bad (since you work without a safety net), or you do it with
md5 (or something similar), which is bad (since it kills performance).
Greek0
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, (continued)
- RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, Parker, Ron, 2004/03/06
- RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin, Robert Collins, 2004/03/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin,
Greek0 <=
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, Parker, Ron, 2004/03/09
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, Parker, Ron, 2004/03/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/10