[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?
From: |
David Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate? |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:24:38 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 06:24:28PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Jan Hudec <address@hidden> writes:
> > You can. Both + and , are ok, so arch kind of won it ;-).
Technically, both '+' and ',' are illegal characters in a FAT filename.
Windows might create them, but then MS is violating its own spec :-)
Dave
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Miles Bader, 2004/03/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Miles Bader, 2004/03/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Miles Bader, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Jani Monoses, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Tom Lord, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?,
David Brown <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/10
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Parker, Ron, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/11