[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Namespace
From: |
Jean Helou |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Namespace |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:59:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) |
I just checked in tla--devo--1.3, just in case this had been corrected
there. Seems not. Maybe these are simply non-issues.
Anyway I'll post a patch for the first one later today just in case. I
don't know if the second one is valid or not, I will assume it is, even
though I never saw it in use :).
Cheers,
Jean
Jean Helou wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading the namsepace validation code in
libarch/namespace.(c|h) and I found the following weird (well
according to me) things (I checked out
address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--patch-115)
-In the email part of an archive name, more specifically in the part
before the @, arch_valid_archive_name(...) won't accept an underscore
('_'). This seems to be inconsistent with arch_valid_id which does
accept them.
address@hidden ~]$tla my-id "Tester Test <address@hidden>"
address@hidden ~]$tla make-archive address@hidden
archives/address@hidden
make-archive: invalid archive name (address@hidden)
-in arch_valid_patch_level_name(...) and over_patch_level(...),
patch-0 is valid.
Are they bugs or is there a reason for this, if so could someone
explain it to me ?
Thx,
Jean
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature