[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert
From: |
David Allouche |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:00:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:50:06PM +0000, Stig Brautaset wrote:
> It sounds equivalent to
>
> $ tla undo REVISION
> $ tla sync-tree `tla tree-version`
>
> to me. The sync-tree is needed to bring back in the missing changelogs
> that would otherwise make tla refuse to commit.
Which of course is wrong if the working tree is not up-to-date.
But
$ rvsn=`tla logs --full --reverse | head -1`
$ tla undo -n REVISION
$ tla sync-tree "$rvsn"
would be correct for that case, but would be incorrect if the working
tree has changes.
--
-- ddaa
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert, Robin Green, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New aba command: revert, name clash with tlash, David Allouche, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New aba command: revert, name clash with tlash, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New aba command: revert, name clash with tlash, David Allouche, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New aba command: revert, name clash with tlash, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New aba command: revert, name clash with tlash, Robin Green, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New aba command: revert, name clash with tlash, David Allouche, 2004/03/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert, Stig Brautaset, 2004/03/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert,
David Allouche <=
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: New aba command: revert, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/26