[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Debian should move all GPL sw to non-free
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Debian should move all GPL sw to non-free |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:16:20 -0800 (PST) |
> From: James Blackwell <address@hidden>
> > [*] "I was mostly interested (in my notes) in constructing (or
> > disproving the existence of) a _positive_ theory of why the GFDL is
> > right"
> > I wound up concluding that GFDL is nearly exactly right _but_:
> > 1) it has a few minor bugs (which aren't even on Debian's map)
> > 2) the eye-on-the-prize perspective is to figure out how to make
> > a future GPL version and GFDL version which are compatible.
> > Conceptually trivial but, hey, _I'm_ not the one who gets to
> > consult with Mr. Moglen on writing it in such a way that it
> > sticks.
> [snipped myself here to save it for the thirty_one_ page rebuttal]
My confusion-supressor kicked in and told me to stress that the Debian
flame does _not_ contain my positive theory of they the GFDL is right.
It's just a side-effect of having that theory here in my scattered
notes.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Debian should move all GPL sw to non-free, James Blackwell, 2004/03/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Debian should move all GPL sw to non-free, Florian Weimer, 2004/03/30
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Debian should move all GPL sw to non-free, Andrew Suffield, 2004/03/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Debian should move all GPL sw to non-free, Robin Green, 2004/03/28