Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla update edge case

[Aaron Bentley]

Miles Bader wrote:
> IOW, it updates the current tree with respect to VERS `underneath' any
> changes between VERS and the current tree.  This formulation is
> _incredibly_ useful (when you're dealing with a fork of VERS, this is
> almost always what you want to do), and I find it `just makes sense.'

Neat.  I just tried it somewhere where I normally use star-merge, and it 
worked like a charm.  Produced some scary-ass change reports, though. 
Does it have any particular advantages over star-merge?

Aaron