Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline]

[Andrew Suffield]

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:19:14AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 13:20 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Huh, interesting timing. I've been thinking about this problem for a
> > week or two, and started to put together some of the intrastructure it
> > needs.
> > 
> > Certainly gcc is a good example of a project which this problem, but
> > I'm not convinced their approach is the best solution. A PQM-driven
> > mainline that only allows commits which do not cause regressions is
> > probably what they really want. But it's easy enough to handle what
> > they currently do.
> 
> Isn't that exactly what arch-pqm can do right now?

Only if you have a magic "Should I merge this?" function.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature