|
From: | Aaron Bentley |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:40:36 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309) |
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
That is the reason why untagged-source files are now "precious" instead of "unrecognized". We may know that it is better to have "untagged-source unrecognized" because it catches mistakes, but many users just expect "untagged-source precious".TL> That particular change to "precious" rather than "unrecognized" was TL> probably a mistake. Could people please explain whence that feeling that building in your working tree is sinful?
That's not the same thing. I have untagged-source set as unrecognized, but I don't "make clean" before committing.
All you have to do is tell Arch that your non-source files are *non-source*, by writing some rules in your =arch-inventory. Once your output files aren't "source", they aren't "untagged-source" either, and so you can commit.
Aaron -- Aaron Bentley Director of Technology Panometrics, Inc.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |