[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:48:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:36:58AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> > /usr/local/src/tla/src/hackerlab/strings/ustr-inlines.c:1037: error:
> incompatible types in return
> > [....]
>
> Weird. The code in question is a (gratuitous) implicit cast from a
> member-field type to a union. Not sure why one of us gets an error
> for that and the other not so much as a warning but....
Could be a difference between gcc versions (I'm using gcc 3.4.something,
whatever's current in Debian unstable).
-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Ghandi
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Richard Curnow, 2004/06/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?,
Miles Bader <=