[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:24:56 +0900 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
>> Are you the victem of some sort of cruel caching proxy hoax?:
>
> Could be, though I did see the update to tla, so at least something's
> working.
I found something else that may explaining: I can see the "patch-79"
directory, but the .listing file doesn't contain it!
Visiting the .listing file in a web-browser and hitting refresh made it
show up.
Is it possible that libneon or whoever does that stuff isn't passing
the appropriate "no-cache" option when retrieving the .listing file?
-Miles
--
`To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to,
all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Charles Duffy, 2004/06/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tez Kamihira, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Richard Curnow, 2004/06/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24