[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to") |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:07:03 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: address@hidden (James Blackwell)
> Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > I mention this because I'm contemplating automating inventory
> > configuration in pyaba, and the notion of modifying the regexes is
> > rather daunting. I can only imagine how much more difficult it would
be
> > if instead of regexes, =tagging-method was written in a Real
Programming
> > Language.
> Is that what he means?!?
> I suspect that many of our users are intimidated by regexes, and
> can barely handle *that*. What on earth are we going to do with the
> political reprocussions of having to tell them that they'll have to
> learn a new language just to configure an archive?
Well, there you go. Another reason to make =tagging-method turing
complete: to create a flexible means of introducing higher-level
abstractions (e.g. "GNU conventions with the following exceptions...")
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Matthew Dempsky, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Charles Duffy, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/06/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"),
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/06/30