gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MA


From: John Meinel
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] How to support arch on systems with a small PATH_MAX [WAS: arch o n windows?]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:56:20 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ron Parker wrote:
|
| Actually, I think in the {arch} directory the flag should be
| +short-path.  This would make it precious instead of source.  I don't
| believe the flag should be checked into the archive, but it should be
| local to the invocation of init-tree, get, build-config, etc.
|
| Otherwise, if someone does a get from a non-short-path archive on a
| POSIX-minimal system, they would have a new {arch}/=short-path and
| this would show up as a change and be checked back into the archive
| upon commit.  What an ugly screw up.  At that point all gets from the
| archive, would potentially create short-paths in the {arch} dir.
|
| I think a simple short-path file in the =meta-info directory would
| suffice for archives.

I agree. I think in {arch} it could be done locally, and would be
created by the local tla program. But in that way, whenever someone
creates a tarball the flag would be kept.

In the archive, I think it should just go into =meta-info/short-path

I would say short-paths, (note the plural) sounds better than the
singular form. But maybe that's just me.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA9v2EJdeBCYSNAAMRAu60AKCd0GYXsH0i4InJ9RCj8AgUjNkKoACfa+Td
JeCjtCQ4wRdeFkF/lfljH5g=
=yXyr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]