Re: [Gnu-arch-users] programming in the large (Re: On configs and huge source trees)

[Alfred M\. Szmidt]

   `tla' in particular seems to very loosely follow the GCS which I
   find a pity---likewise, I find it pitiful that it's really called
   `tla' instead of GNU Arch, that's again counter-harmonizing.

The thing with the GCS is that it has important parts, which people
ignore, and then only read the bit about how to indent C code.  The
bits that people ignore are really the important one, how you indent
the code is really unimportant as long as it is consitent.  And from
the brief look I have done on tla's inner workings, it actually
follows most of those principles.

As for the name, tla is far better than having a command called arch!