[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch! |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:50:41 +0200 |
--- gcc-3.4.4/gcc/reload1.c 2005-03-18 06:11:35.000000000 +0900
+++ gcc-3.4.4-supk0-20051028/gcc/reload1.c 2005-10-28 20:32:40.695594000
+0900
As I'm careful to always use meaningful tags, that tells me exactly
what was diffed, and does so in an in-band manner that is unlikely to
get lost (e.g., by patch-munging programs) or overlooked.
Well, meaningful tags are useful (like when you work on two branches,
as your example shows), but non-meaningful ones suck, like what is
currently being use, mod and orig. Which to my experience is what
most people use, non-meaningful ones.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new GNU Arch 1 source archive location, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Miles Bader, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Miles Bader, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Miles Bader, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Miles Bader, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Andy Tai, 2005/10/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Peter Conrad, 2005/10/28
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Good News about GNU Arch!, Rene Schallner, 2005/10/28