[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206 |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:53:14 +0900 |
Thomas Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> (3) It's nice if the doc sources are reasonably attractive as plain
> text. And then derive all the formats you like from that. Which
> would suggest I should be a bigger docbook fan than I actually am but
> I'm not (as a source text form), so there.
Eh, how does that follow? Docbook sources are horribly ugly -- they're
_so_ verbose that it's often quite a chore to even find the underlying
text for all the layers of (verbose) tagging. I've never written a
document in docbook, but for the same reason it looks like pure drudgery
to write if you're not using rather heavy editor magic.
I would never consider docbook an acceptable source form as long as
people expect to able to reasonably edit the sources as raw text.
-Miles
--
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Thomas Lord, 2006/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Mark A. Flacy, 2006/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Miles Bader, 2006/10/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Mark Flacy, 2006/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Mark Flacy, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Andrea Russo, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Mark Flacy, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Mark Flacy, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05