[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:23:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
"Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <address@hidden> writes:
> Each source file which has a license header asks the reader to refer
> to the src/COPYING file for the license terms of the package in this
> case.
You're right: these are "non-standard" headers, so we're stuck (i.e.,
your interpretation that it's "GPLv2-only" sounds right). And since
there are several copyright holders (and not the FSF), we're all the
more stuck. :-)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/17