[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:07:14 +0100 (CET) |
> The COPYING file is a copy of the GNU GPL, it doesn't state what
> the license is of the whole package. You have to look at each
> file, and not at the actual license terms to see what the actual
> terms are of the package.
Each source file which has a license header asks the reader to
refer to the src/COPYING file for the license terms of the package
in this case.
Then Tom needs a good spanking for obfuscating things for no peculiar
reson.
- [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/17