Re: [GNU Crypto] why not jars?

[Casey Marshall]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "pancake" == pancake  <address@hidden> writes:

pancake> I think that could be nice to distribute sources and binaries
pancake> of gnu-crypto and the rest of gnu classes.

I might look into this. It is usually a matter of course that we
distribute source, not binaries.

pancake> The main reason of this topic is for packaging purposes. I'm
pancake> packaging gnu/java applications for pkgsrc. And I have many
pancake> problems building this libraries under kaffe/jikes/bsd
pancake> environment.

What sort of problems?

pancake> If the answer is 'no' the other question is if I could
pancake> distribute them in .jar form.

Yes, but if you do so, you also have to distribute the source with
it.

- -- 
Casey Marshall || address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFAHGbggAuWMgRGsWsRApATAJ9cT1TCInXBBojBLC3vspcGye6RHACfWAQf
uPaqpIbc3SNdulQNMq1LtIg=
=rO1W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----