[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:15:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> First off, I'm surprised.
That's Terekhov world.
> I hope Wallace will appeal.
Offer him to pay all the expenses this might entail. Anyway,
appealing this dismissal is not going to be too easy, short of
procedural mistakes, and there does not seem to be much leeway for
that. It would appear that the court granted Wallace plenty of rope
to hang himself before drawing the line.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/22