Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>> 
>>    > "Although a vertical, maximum-price-fixing agreement is unlawful
>>    > under 1 of the Sherman Act, it does not cause a competitor
>>    > antitrust injury unless it results in predatory pricing." --
>>    > U.S. Supreme Court
>> 
>>    You have yet to show that setting a price at zero is predatory
>>    pricing. Just selling below cost is not by definition predatory.
>> 
>> He also has to show that the GPL actually sets a fixed price of zero
>> (or anything else for that matter) for a work.
>
> Hey paragon of intellect, please read the GPL 2 b).

That's not "for a work" but for the act of licensing under the GPL.
You can charge whatever you want for a work, but the GPL license (and
the source code) must not cost extra.

You really should be more careful with dishing out insults.  It makes
yourself look even more ridiculous.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum