[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:37:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> Merijn de Weerd wrote:
> [...]
>> Wallace got dismissed because he could not show injury.
>
> Judge Tinder silently ignored Wallace's argument regarding predatory
> pricing which is central to antitrust injury in Wallace's case. The
> Judge didn't explain why he did it. To me, it appears that he is less
> versed in antitrust than Wallace.
To you a lot of things appear. Legal competence necessitates a
certain correlation to what things appear to judges. And they
apparently have not been raised in Terekhov land.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), (continued)
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Merijn de Weerd, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Merijn de Weerd, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Merijn de Weerd, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Merijn de Weerd, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25