[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:49:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Man oh man, to doctor, to doctor you should go, Hyman.
http://www.dfc.org/dfc1/Active_Issues/graphic/first_sale.html
You have quoted the "Reply Comments of the Library
Associations" which is a wish list, not the law. The
law is going to shaped by various cases, but it's
clear that the notion that all copies made under
permission are subject to first-sale is unlikely to
be correct.
For example, various services exist which permit the
downloading of songs, and set a limit on the number
of devices to which that song may be copied. I don't
believe that the courts will hold that each such copy
becomes separately subject to first-sale permission.
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, (continued)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/13
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/13